DocumentationPricingMultiPrimeX Store
EnglishenالعربيةSoonDeutschSoonEspañolSoonفارسیSoonFrançaisSoonहिन्दीSoonItalianoSoon日本語Soon한국어SoonPortuguêsSoonРусскийSoonTürkçeSoon简体中文Soon繁體中文Soon

Infrastructure

Collateral trapped in the wrong account is idle capital

It is the cost nobody quotes and almost every multi-provider desk carries. Money posted against one relationship and unused while another is short earns nothing and still has a funding cost.

Split across providersOne account
Collateral

Posted per provider, idle where unused

One pool, available wherever it is needed

Netting

Only within each relationship

Across every asset class you hold

Margin calls

Several, independently and at different times

One position, one call

Reallocating

A transfer, with a delay and a cut-off

No movement required at all

Reporting

Several statements to reconcile

One record, one reconciliation

Three things worth stating precisely

Consolidation does not mean everything nets at one rate

Netting is not uniform

Asset classes carry their own margin requirements even inside one account. Digital asset exposure is not offset against a currency position at a common rate, because the risk genuinely differs.

One number, drillable

The consolidated requirement is a single figure you can open to see what each class contributes. A total nobody can decompose is a total nobody acts on.

Warnings before the call

Utilisation is visible with thresholds ahead of the requirement being breached, because the options available at eighty per cent are considerably better than the ones at a hundred.

See it live

One utilisation figure, drillable by asset class

Gauges and per-group limits drawn from a single collateral pool, with warnings surfaced ahead of a margin call rather than after it.

Single collateral pool broken down by asset class with margin utilisation and warning threshold

Funding and settlement

What the account can actually be settled in

Settle in fiat or digital assets

The account can be funded and settled in traditional currency or in digital assets, which matters for a desk whose treasury already holds both and would otherwise convert twice to do one trade.

Collateral is marked, not assumed

Digital assets posted as collateral carry a haircut and are revalued continuously. Accepting them at face value is what turns a volatile week into a margin call nobody modelled.

Conversion is explicit

Where a settlement currency differs from the account currency, the rate and the moment it was struck are recorded, so a difference months later has a documented cause.

What counts as collateral

Posted value and credited value are not the same number

Indicative bands. The schedule that applies to your account is agreed in writing and reviewed as markets change.

CollateralHaircutWhy
Account currency0%

Full credit, no conversion exposure

Major fiat1 – 3%

Converted at a rate refreshed through the session

Major digital assets15 – 30%

Marked continuously, not once a day

Smaller digital assets40%+

Thin books make the mark optimistic under stress

Margin rises with size

The requirement is tiered rather than flat: the first band of a position is margined at the headline rate and later bands at higher ones, because the cost of exiting a position is not linear in how big it is.

A ceiling on open exposure

Your account carries an agreed limit on total net open position across all asset classes. It is set with you during onboarding and reviewed as your book grows, rather than discovered when an order is refused.

Utilisation is visible before it binds

How much of the limit is consumed shows continuously alongside margin, so approaching the ceiling is something your desk sees rather than something a rejection tells you.

Per-currency collateral ceilings

How much margin credit any single collateral currency may provide can be capped, so a book is never quietly resting on one volatile asset.

FAQ

Single margin account: common questions

6 short answers to what teams ask before a demo.

Idle collateral. Capital posted against one provider and unused while another relationship is short is a real funding cost, and for most desks it is larger than the spread difference that led them to split providers in the first place.

No, and they should not. Each class carries a margin requirement appropriate to its own volatility. Netting them at a blended rate would understate the risk in the volatile ones and overstate it in the stable ones.

Yes. The consolidated figure opens to show what each of the 11 classes contributes. A total nobody can decompose is a total nobody makes decisions from.

One call against the consolidated position rather than several arriving independently. Utilisation warnings are surfaced ahead of it, since the options at eighty per cent utilisation are better than the ones at a hundred.

Yes, with conversion applied for the requirement calculation. The point is that collateral is not stranded in a denomination that happens to be the wrong one today.

This is your firm's account with us. How you segregate your own clients' funds is governed by your licence and handled in your own systems, and nothing here changes that obligation.

Still have a question?

A specialist will answer it directly, with your set-up in mind.

Ask a specialist
Capital review

How much of your collateral is idle right now?

Add up what is posted against each provider and unused. That figure is usually larger than the spread saving that justified splitting them.

Call us+971 52 654 0123WhatsApp+971 52 654 0123Email usinfo@multiprimex.com
Book a demo