DocumentationPricingMultiPrimeX Store
EnglishenالعربيةSoonDeutschSoonEspañolSoonفارسیSoonFrançaisSoonहिन्दीSoonItalianoSoon日本語Soon한국어SoonPortuguêsSoonРусскийSoonTürkçeSoon简体中文Soon繁體中文Soon

Services

Most platform incidents announce themselves first

A feed goes stale before clients trade the wrong price. Rejections climb before fills stop. Disk fills before the server dies. The question is only whether anyone is watching, and whether they can act.

See it live

What actually fires, and why

Quote staleness, gateway state and rejection rate sit in the same alert list your on-call engineer is actually watching, not a dashboard built for a demo.

Live signal dashboard with status pills and an escalation ladder

The signals

What is watched, and what each one is telling you

SignalWhat it catchesWhy it matters
Quote staleness

A feed that stopped updating but has not disconnected

Clients trade a price the market has left behind

Gateway state

Connection drops, reconnect loops, sequence gaps

Orders route to a destination that cannot fill them

Rejection rate

A rising share of orders refused by a destination

The earliest sign a provider is degrading

Execution latency

Time from order to acknowledgement, per destination

Slippage rises before anything visibly breaks

Resource pressure

Disk, memory and connection counts against headroom

The failure that takes the whole server, not one symbol

Session boundaries

Instruments trading outside their configured session

A calendar error, found before a client finds it

The escalation ladder

What happens after something fires

Automatic

Immediate

Defined conditions trigger a defined response without waiting for a human — falling back to a secondary feed, disabling a failing gateway, suspending a symbol whose price source has gone stale.

On-call engineer

Minutes

Anything not covered by an automatic response reaches a named engineer who knows your environment, not a general queue that has to read your documentation first.

Escalation

As agreed

If the first responder cannot contain it within an agreed period, it escalates to a senior engineer and to whichever of your people you have nominated.

Written follow-up

After the fact

An account of what happened, what was changed, and what will prevent a recurrence. Sent to you, not published on a status page and left there.

Three things worth saying plainly

Monitoring fails in predictable ways

Alerts that fire constantly are not monitoring

A channel that produces noise every hour gets muted within a fortnight, and then nothing is being watched at all. Thresholds are tuned until an alert genuinely means something.

Someone has to be awake

Monitoring without an on-call rota is a dashboard. The value is not in detecting the incident at 3am; it is in someone acting on it at 3am.

Your channels, not ours

Alerts route into the tooling your team already uses, so an incident does not first require somebody to log into a system they only visit when something is broken.

FAQ

Monitoring and alerting: common questions

6 short answers to what teams ask before a demo.

Quote staleness, gateway and session state, rejection rates per destination, execution latency, resource pressure on the servers, and whether instruments are trading within their configured sessions. The list is tuned to your environment rather than applied generically.

Continuous coverage is the standard arrangement, with a named engineer on your account and a rota behind them so it does not depend on one person's availability. The precise response commitments are agreed in writing rather than implied.

Conditions with an agreed automatic response — falling back to a secondary feed, disabling a failing gateway, suspending a symbol whose price source has gone stale. These are defined with you in advance, because an automatic action taken without agreement is its own kind of incident.

Into the channels your team already uses, alongside ours. An alert that only exists inside a vendor's system is one your people cannot act on independently.

Yes. Anything that triggered a response is reported, including the ones contained before they had client impact. Only reporting the visible failures gives a misleading picture of how the environment is actually behaving.

Yes. You get visibility into the same signals rather than a summary of them, so you can form your own view of how the platform is running instead of relying on our characterisation of it.

Still have a question?

A specialist will answer it directly, with your set-up in mind.

Ask a specialist
Coverage review

Find out what is not being watched

We will check what your current monitoring covers, where it is silent, and whether anybody is positioned to act on it.

Call us+971 52 654 0123WhatsApp+971 52 654 0123Email usinfo@multiprimex.com
Book a demo