DocumentationPricingMultiPrimeX Store
EnglishenالعربيةSoonDeutschSoonEspañolSoonفارسیSoonFrançaisSoonहिन्दीSoonItalianoSoon日本語Soon한국어SoonPortuguêsSoonРусскийSoonTürkçeSoon简体中文Soon繁體中文Soon

Reporting

The question is never whether it happened

It is who decided, what they were looking at, and why it seemed reasonable at the time. Recollection is not evidence, and months later it is not even reliable.

See it live

Every change, with who and when attached

Limit changes and overrides sit in a searchable list, each entry carrying the author and the reason, the same way a key’s usage history would.

Append-only audit trail timeline listing each change, the actor and the reason behind it

What is recorded

Six event types, each with the context around it

EventWhat is captured
Limit changed

Old value, new value, author, reason, effective time

Breach occurred

Which limit, by how much, and the positions responsible

Override granted

Who authorised it, the reason given, and any expiry set

Automated action

The rule that fired, its threshold, and what it did

Manual intervention

The dealer, the action, and the screen state at the time

Rule modified

The previous version, so history stays interpretable

Three properties

Without all three it is a log rather than a trail

Append-only

Entries are added, never edited or removed. A trail that can be modified answers no question that anyone would think to ask of it.

State captured, not just the action

Knowing a limit was overridden is half the story. Knowing what the exposure and utilisation were at that moment is what makes the decision assessable rather than merely visible.

Searchable by the question you have

By client, instrument, person, rule or time window. A trail that can only be exported and grepped is technically complete and practically unusable.

FAQ

Audit trail: common questions

6 short answers to what teams ask before a demo.

For your retention period — the default is 7 yrs, and it is configurable to whatever your jurisdiction requires. Entries are never edited or removed within that window.

Limit changes, breaches, overrides, automated actions, manual interventions and rule modifications. Each carries who, when, why and — critically — the exposure and utilisation state at that moment.

Because a decision should be judged against what was visible at the time rather than what became known afterwards. Without the state, every past decision is assessed with hindsight, which is neither fair nor useful.

No. The trail is append-only. A correction is a new entry referencing the original, because a record that can be altered cannot answer the question it exists for.

By client, instrument, person, rule or time window. A trail that can only be exported wholesale is complete on paper and unusable when somebody actually needs an answer.

Yes, and it covers different ground. Platform logs record what happened to orders. This records what the risk function decided, which is what an examiner asks about and what platform logs do not contain.

Still have a question?

A specialist will answer it directly, with your set-up in mind.

Ask a specialist
Audit review

Could you explain a limit override from last March?

Who granted it, what the exposure was at the time, and what reason they gave. That is the standard, and most desks cannot meet it.

Call us+971 52 654 0123WhatsApp+971 52 654 0123Email usinfo@multiprimex.com
Book a demo