DocumentationPricingMultiPrimeX Store
EnglishenالعربيةSoonDeutschSoonEspañolSoonفارسیSoonFrançaisSoonहिन्दीSoonItalianoSoon日本語Soon한국어SoonPortuguêsSoonРусскийSoonTürkçeSoon简体中文Soon繁體中文Soon

Execution

Where an order goes should be a decision, not a default

Routing rules are evaluated per order against the live book, your venue preferences and your current exposure. An order can go to one venue, be split across several, or never leave your book at all.

Rule set — EUR/USD

First match wins
  1. 1size > 5MSplit across A, B
  2. 2reduces exposureInternalise
  3. 3instrument in FX majorsBest price
  4. 4otherwisePreferred venue A

Illustrative rules. Ordering is explicit, so the outcome is predictable under pressure.

See it live

Every order, tracked to its destination

Working, filled and cancelled orders in one table, each carrying the venue it was routed to and the rule that sent it there.

Table of working, filled and cancelled orders with the venue each was routed to

The rules you can actually express

Rules are ordered and the first match wins, which keeps behaviour predictable

best-price

Best price

The order goes to whichever source is showing the best executable price for the required size, taking depth into account rather than top of book alone.

preferred

Preferred venue

A named venue takes the flow while it is healthy and within its limits, with a fallback order defined for when it is not.

weighted

Weighted distribution

Flow is spread across several venues in proportions you set, which is how volume commitments are honoured without manual intervention.

exposure

Exposure-based

The rule consults your current net exposure, so an order that would reduce risk can be internalised while one that increases it is routed out.

split

Order splitting

Where no single source can fill the size at an acceptable price, the order is split across sources and the fills are reported as one execution.

One order through the router

Four steps, all of which happen before the client notices any delay

  1. Evaluate

    Rules in order, first match wins

    The rule set for that instrument is evaluated against the order, the current book and your live exposure. Ordering is explicit so the outcome is predictable.

  2. Select

    One destination, or several

    The rule resolves to a venue, a set of venues with sizes, or internalisation. Unhealthy sources are excluded before selection rather than after.

  3. Execute

    Sent, and watched

    Orders are placed with the venue's own precision and size conventions. A rejection or timeout triggers the configured fallback immediately.

  4. Record

    Outcome attributed to the venue

    Fill or rejection, latency and realised slippage are written against the venue, which is what feeds the statistics behind future routing decisions.

What routing control is worth

Execution cost is a rounding error per trade and a serious number per year.

Lower execution cost

Best-price routing across sources beats a single relationship, consistently.

Commitments honoured

Weighted distribution meets volume agreements without anyone tracking it manually.

Continuity

Failover means one venue's rejection storm does not become your outage.

Evidence for renewals

Per-venue statistics turn a commercial discussion into a factual one.

FAQ

Routing: common questions

5 short answers to what teams ask before a demo.

Rules are configured per instrument and evaluated in order. The first rule whose conditions match determines the destination, which keeps the outcome predictable rather than emergent.

No. It considers depth, so the source chosen is the one that can fill the required size at the best effective price rather than the one showing the best price for a token amount.

Yes. Where no single source can fill the size acceptably, the order is split and the resulting fills are reported back as a single execution with the venue breakdown retained.

The configured fallback is triggered immediately. Persistent rejection above a threshold removes that venue from routing until it recovers, so one misbehaving source cannot absorb repeated attempts.

Yes. An exposure-based rule consults live net position, which allows risk-reducing orders to be internalised while risk-increasing ones are routed out.

Still have a question?

A specialist will answer it directly, with your set-up in mind.

Ask a specialist
Routing

Write your routing rules with us

Describe how you want flow handled today and we will express it as rules in a live environment.

Call us+971 52 654 0123WhatsApp+971 52 654 0123Email usinfo@multiprimex.com
Book a demo